Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Abstracts of essays; news; announcements; short takes.
About Me
- Yawning Bread Sampler
- This blog carries summary abstracts of Yawning Bread essays, with space for comments.
Here too are other tidbits that are too short for the main Yawning Bread site.
To email me, go to the main site.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(161)
-
▼
August
(22)
- The Good News Times strikes again
- Religious affiliation of MPs
- Teacher's termination still unaccounted for
- CPF and its creaky assumptions
- Cinema: Jesus camp
- Singapore second last in Asia democracy index
- Race, religion and Negarakuku
- 2 by 6
- Police declare joggers an "illegal assembly"
- Time travel via our roads
- Spirits from our past
- Pity the heliconias
- Death by numbers, part 2
- Death by numbers
- Picking on a picnic
- Public transport model needs a rethink
- Bark and crumble
- Letter to the people of Singapore
- My kissing project, part 4
- Lee Low Tar
- Where to draw the line on marriage?
- My kissing project, part 3
-
▼
August
(22)
Posts
3 comments:
If the Churches continue to treat gay Christians as sinners, wouldn't it more convenient and less problematic for the Churches not to accept them in the first place. Just tell them to stop being Christians. Go follow other religions for what they care !
If the same logic were to be applied, wouldn't it be better for the Government to get rid of all gay Singaporeans since by definition under the Penal Code, they would be regarded as criminals . It is only by getting rid of them in the first place, then only our country will be a much acceptable place in the eyes of the our "conservative society".
Shouldn't the Government start a campaign to get rid of homosexuals in our society just like what Hitler did if they are such a menace and cannot be accepted as ordinary human beings ?
To get published in the ST, there are certain things you should do:
1) Use your real name, and
2) Keep your letter short. There is now a 400 word limit for letters published in the print edition of the ST. While longer letters have been accepted to the online edition, a letter of this length is still unlikely to get published.
yep. as much as the 400 word limit is probably also an excuse to limit serious and lengthly discourse, i'm not as sure that it's a tool to limit the choice of topic and stance. it'd be interesting to see they'd publish such a letter if it manages to be short and yet strongly pro-gay.
Post a Comment