03 May 2009

Flyers and flying laws

Ignored by the media, the trial of Chee Soon Juan and other Singapore Democratic Party leaders continued in the third week of April. They are accused of doing something which hundreds of people do openly every day. Full essay.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

"We first rape the concept of democracy by passing all sorts of laws that choke off free speech and assembly. Then when the laws themselves don't specifically cover certain situations that the government dislikes, we interpret the laws any way we please. Frankly, it is disgraceful."

To break this vicious circle of abuse, we as concerned citizens, must deny the ruling Party any more Parliamentary majority, so that they cannot pass legislation any old way they please.

Anonymous said...

It is indeed disgraceful.

Anonymous said...

Thank you for speaking up for the SDP, the only party that supports gay rights.

We owe it to them.

Anonymous said...

To the anonymous above,

"To break this vicious circle of abuse, we as concerned citizens, must deny the ruling Party any more Parliamentary majority, so that they cannot pass legislation any old way they please."

I am afraid that your statement is just wishful thinking of most who prefer an easier way out of this vicious circle.

As the way things are now, PAP's being denied the parliamentary majority will never happen.

Chris said...

How can you have criminal laws that are not available to the public?

I hope the court is going to throw this case out. If the police aren't sure why they should arrest you then you're probably not committing an offence.

I love the contradictions you see in Singapore - wealthy and highly developed but with a draconian legal system.

Anonymous said...

We first rape the concept of democracy by passing all sorts of laws that choke off free speech and assembly. Then when the laws themselves don't specifically cover certain situations that the government dislikes, we interpret the laws any way we please. Frankly, it is disgraceful.The starting point to overturn this disgraceful position is the Judiciary -- i.e. the judges -- now.

They certainly can, even under the current law, make such charges unlawful. The real question is whether the judges are prepared to do so or are they going to go by the standard excuse that their hands are tied.

I have my feeling what the outcome would be but I certainly hope to be surprised.

Anonymous said...

The outcome would as you would expect from our Judicial system. The Judges have to toe the line or get demoted to Traffic Court. Action speak loud than words. If we really have a fair court system, then, the outcome will reflect this. Sad to say, disappointments after disappointments is going to be the norm for our Judicial system especially when it involves politics.

Desmond Lim said...

Seriously, do we expect anything different?